# ProActor: Timing-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Proactive Task Scheduling Agents

Source: [ProActor: Timing-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Proactive Task Scheduling Agents](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a152914dbd7150506f7deaa>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-27T05:00:13.467Z

Authors: Lei Ding, Bin He, Chenguang Wang, Yang Liu

Published: 2026-05-24T06:56:06.000Z

## Abstract

Proactive task-oriented agents must autonomously anticipate user needs, identify actionable opportunities, and trigger software actions at appropriate moments - fundamentally shifting from reactive systems that await explicit instructions. However, existing approaches lack generalizable end-to-end solutions for measuring and optimizing such anticipatory behaviors.   This paper introduces ProActor, a unified framework for conversational task scheduling that integrates: (1) a domain-agnostic automated annotation methodology that enables scalable proactiveness reinforcement learning (RL) by generating full opportunity time windows instead of rigid point labels, (2) systematic proactiveness metrics capturing both timing quality and reference action alignment, and (3) RL optimization using GRPO with various reward designs. Our insight is that RULER-based rewards with proactiveness rubrics are crucial for improving timing quality, and that proactiveness optimization enabled by stage-aware composite rewards is key to balancing timing quality and reference action alignment.   Timing-aware RL requires extensive exploration, demanding efficient infrastructure. We develop ART-F, an adaptive framework combining request-adaptive inference clusters with DDP-based training on single-node multi-GPU systems, enabling LoRA training of 4-bit Qwen2.5-14B-ProActor-Q4 with 4-8x speedups. Experiments on two newly auto-annotated datasets demonstrate significant improvements in proactive timing while maintaining action consistency comparable to state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines. Ablations validate the effectiveness of distinct composite reward variations.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Proactive Action Prediction on ABCD+](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/proactive-action-prediction-on-abcd-plus.md>): Proactive Action Prediction; ABCD+; PRI: 0.7293.

- [Proactive Action Prediction on Home Loan](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/proactive-action-prediction-on-home-loan.md>): Proactive Action Prediction; Home Loan; PRI: 0.6232.

- [Proactive task scheduling on Home Loan (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/proactive-task-scheduling-on-home-loan-test.md>): Proactive task scheduling; Home Loan (test); PRI: 62.32.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24900>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.24900.pdf>)
