# SemLT3D: Semantic-Guided Expert Distillation for Camera-only Long-Tailed 3D Object Detection

Source: [SemLT3D: Semantic-Guided Expert Distillation for Camera-only Long-Tailed 3D Object Detection](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e7052d7d0172140ec7f359>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-22T05:23:53.567Z

Authors: Hao Vo, Khoa Vo, Thinh Phan, Ngo Xuan Cuong, Gianfranco Doretto, Hien Nguyen, Anh Nguyen, Ngan Le

Published: 2026-04-20T16:28:01.000Z

## Abstract

Camera-only 3D object detection has emerged as a cost-effective and scalable alternative to LiDAR for autonomous driving, yet existing methods primarily prioritize overall performance while overlooking the severe long-tail imbalance inherent in real-world datasets. In practice, many rare but safety-critical categories such as children, strollers, or emergency vehicles are heavily underrepresented, leading to biased learning and degraded performance. This challenge is further exacerbated by pronounced inter-class ambiguity (e.g., visually similar subclasses) and substantial intra-class diversity (e.g., objects varying widely in appearance, scale, pose, or context), which together hinder reliable long-tail recognition. In this work, we introduce SemLT3D, a Semantic-Guided Expert Distillation framework designed to enrich the representation space for underrepresented classes through semantic priors. SemLT3D consists of: (1) a language-guided mixture-of-experts module that routes 3D queries to specialized experts according to their semantic affinity, enabling the model to better disentangle confusing classes and specialize on tail distributions; and (2) a semantic projection distillation pipeline that aligns 3D queries with CLIP-informed 2D semantics, producing more coherent and discriminative features across diverse visual manifestations. Although motivated by long-tail imbalance, the semantically structured learning in SemLT3D also improves robustness under broader appearance variations and challenging corner cases, offering a principled step toward more reliable camera-only 3D perception.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [3D Object Detection on nuScenes (val) (AP by Instance Count)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-object-detection-on-nuscenes-val-ap-by-instance-count.md>): 3D Object Detection; nuScenes (val); mAP (All): 41.1.

- [3D Object Detection on Argoverse 2 (val)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-object-detection-on-argoverse-2-val.md>): 3D Object Detection; Argoverse 2 (val); mAP: 25.9.

- [3D Object Detection on nuScenes v1.0-trainval (val)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/3d-object-detection-on-nuscenes-v1-0-trainval-val.md>): 3D Object Detection; nuScenes v1.0-trainval (val); NDS: 42.79.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18476>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.18476.pdf>)
