# RACF: A Resilient Autonomous Car Framework with Object Distance Correction

Source: [RACF: A Resilient Autonomous Car Framework with Object Distance Correction](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69df1b797d0172140ec7b825>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-16T05:00:04.684Z

Authors: Chieh Tsai, Hossein Rastgoftar, Salim Hariri

Published: 2026-04-14T08:06:09.000Z

## Abstract

Autonomous vehicles are increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications, where sensing failures or cyberphysical attacks can lead to unsafe operations resulting in human loss and/or severe physical damages. Reliable real-time perception is therefore critically important for their safe operations and acceptability. For example, vision-based distance estimation is vulnerable to environmental degradation and adversarial perturbations, and existing defenses are often reactive and too slow to promptly mitigate their impacts on safe operations. We present a Resilient Autonomous Car Framework (RACF) that incorporates an Object Distance Correction Algorithm (ODCA) to improve perception-layer robustness through redundancy and diversity across a depth camera, LiDAR, and physics-based kinematics. Within this framework, when obstacle distance estimation produced by depth camera is inconsistent, a cross-sensor gate activates the correction algorithm to fix the detected inconsistency. We have experiment with the proposed resilient car framework and evaluate its performance on a testbed implemented using the Quanser QCar 2 platform. The presented framework achieved up to 35% RMSE reduction under strong corruption and improves stop compliance and braking latency, while operating in real time. These results demonstrate a practical and lightweight approach to resilient perception for safety-critical autonomous driving

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Distance estimation on QCar 2 Multi-Sensor Driving Benchmark (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/distance-estimation-on-qcar-2-multi-sensor-driving-benchmark-test.md>): Distance Estimation; QCar 2 Multi-Sensor Driving Benchmark (test); RMSE: 0.111.

- [Distance Estimation on QCar 2 indoor map (strong attacks)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/distance-estimation-on-qcar-2-indoor-map-strong-attacks.md>): Distance Estimation; QCar 2 indoor map (strong attacks); RMSE: 0.323.

- [Closed-loop stop-sign response on QCar real-world trials 2](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/closed-loop-stop-sign-response-on-qcar-real-world-trials-2.md>): Closed-loop stop-sign response; QCar real-world trials 2; Stop Compliance Rate (SCR): 80.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12418>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.12418.pdf>)
