# Neural Operators for Multi-Task Control and Adaptation

Source: [Neural Operators for Multi-Task Control and Adaptation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48fa17d0172140ec743d0>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-08T05:00:04.658Z

Authors: David Sewell, Xingjian Li, Stepan Tretiakov, Krishna Kumar, David Fridovich-Keil

Published: 2026-04-03T20:45:32.000Z

## Abstract

Neural operator methods have emerged as powerful tools for learning mappings between infinite-dimensional function spaces, yet their potential in optimal control remains largely unexplored. We focus on multi-task control problems, whose solution is a mapping from task description (e.g., cost or dynamics functions) to optimal control law (e.g., feedback policy). We approximate these solution operators using a permutation-invariant neural operator architecture. Across a range of parametric optimal control environments and a locomotion benchmark, a single operator trained via behavioral cloning accurately approximates the solution operator and generalizes to unseen tasks, out-of-distribution settings, and varying amounts of task observations. We further show that the branch-trunk structure of our neural operator architecture enables efficient and flexible adaptation to new tasks. We develop structured adaptation strategies ranging from lightweight updates to full-network fine-tuning, achieving strong performance across different data and compute settings. Finally, we introduce meta-trained operator variants that optimize the initialization for few-shot adaptation. These methods enable rapid task adaptation with limited data and consistently outperform a popular meta-learning baseline. Together, our results demonstrate that neural operators provide a unified and efficient framework for multi-task control and adaptation.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Behavioral Cloning on P2P-Dyn.](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/behavioral-cloning-on-p2p-dyn.md>): Behavioral Cloning; P2P-Dyn.; Relative L2 Error: 0.081.

- [Behavioral Cloning on P2P Small](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/behavioral-cloning-on-p2p-small.md>): Behavioral Cloning; P2P Small; Relative L2 Error: 0.077.

- [Behavioral Cloning on P2P-Cost](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/behavioral-cloning-on-p2p-cost.md>): Behavioral Cloning; P2P-Cost; Relative L2 Error: 6.9.

- [Behavioral Cloning on Planar Quadrotor](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/behavioral-cloning-on-planar-quadrotor.md>): Behavioral Cloning; Planar Quadrotor; Relative L2 Error: 0.066.

- [Behavioral Cloning on Obstacle](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/behavioral-cloning-on-obstacle.md>): Behavioral Cloning; obstacle; Relative L2 Error: 0.285.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03449>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.03449.pdf>)
