# LiME: Lightweight Mixture of Experts for Efficient Multimodal Multi-task Learning

Source: [LiME: Lightweight Mixture of Experts for Efficient Multimodal Multi-task Learning](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d33e0b7d0172140ec736af>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-07T05:00:04.607Z

Authors: Md Kowsher, Haris Mansoor, Nusrat Jahan Prottasha, Ozlem Garibay, Victor Zhu, Zhengping Ji, Chen Chen

Published: 2026-02-01T01:37:34.000Z

## Abstract

MoE-PEFT methods combine Mixture of Experts with parameter-efficient fine-tuning for multi-task adaptation, but require separate adapters per expert causing trainable parameters to scale linearly with expert count and limiting applicability to adapter-based architectures. We propose LiME (Lightweight Mixture of Experts), which achieves expert specialization through lightweight modulation rather than adapter replication. Instead of separate adapters, LiME uses a single shared PEFT module and modulates its output with lightweight expert vectors, reducing expert parameters while generalizing to any PEFT method. Notably, LiME introduces zero-parameter routing by leveraging existing frozen and adapted representations eliminating learned router parameters typically required per layer. Theoretically, we prove that (i) more experts preserve more task-relevant information and (ii) modulation approximates full expert-specific PEFT with bounded error. LiME further incorporates n-gram windowed routing and adaptive expert selection (Auto Top-K) based on routing confidence. Experiments on MMT-47, a multimodal multi-task benchmark with 47 tasks spanning text, image, and video, demonstrate that LiME achieves competitive or superior performance while using up to 4x fewer trainable parameters and up to 29% faster training compared to corresponding MoE-PEFT baselines.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Commonsense Reasoning on MMT-47 Commonsense Reasoning](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/commonsense-reasoning-on-mmt-47-commonsense-reasoning.md>): Commonsense Reasoning; MMT-47 Commonsense Reasoning; Accuracy: 84.98.

- [Object Motion and Spatial Reasoning on MMT-47](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/object-motion-and-spatial-reasoning-on-mmt-47.md>): Object Motion and Spatial Reasoning; MMT-47 Object Motion & Spatial; Accuracy: 65.41.

- [Vision Understanding on MMT-47 Vision Benchmark](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/vision-understanding-on-mmt-47-vision-benchmark.md>): Vision Understanding; MMT-47 Vision Benchmark; Accuracy: 78.12.

- [Action Understanding on MMT-47 Action Understanding](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/action-understanding-on-mmt-47-action-understanding.md>): Action Understanding; MMT-47 Action Understanding; Accuracy: 53.39.

- [Natural Language Understanding on GLUE (General Accuracy)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/natural-language-understanding-on-glue-general-accuracy.md>): Natural Language Understanding; GLUE; Accuracy: 91.19.

- [MMT-47 High Level Reasoning](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/mmt-47-high-level-reasoning.md>): High-Level Reasoning; MMT-47 High Level Reasoning; Accuracy: 45.65.

- [Image Classification on MMT-47](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-mmt-47.md>): Image Classification; MMT-47; Accuracy: 94.61.

- [Language Understanding on GLUE (test) (SST-2, QNLI, QQP, CoLA, MRPC, STS-B Subset)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/language-understanding-on-glue-test-sst-2-qnli-qqp-cola-mrpc-sts-b-subset.md>): Language Understanding; GLUE (test); SST-2 Score: 95.99.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02338>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.02338.pdf>)
