# Semantic-Aware Interruption Detection in Spoken Dialogue Systems: Benchmark, Metric, and Model

Source: [Semantic-Aware Interruption Detection in Spoken Dialogue Systems: Benchmark, Metric, and Model](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c4bdb70636e5bf4afc7774>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-27T05:00:04.195Z

Authors: Kangxiang Xia, Bingshen Mu, Xian Shi, Jin Xu, Lei Xie

Published: 2026-03-25T10:11:33.000Z

## Abstract

Achieving natural full-duplex interaction in spoken dialogue systems (SDS) remains a challenge due to the difficulty of accurately detecting user interruptions. Current solutions are polarized between "trigger-happy" VAD-based methods that misinterpret backchannels and robust end-to-end models that exhibit unacceptable response delays. Moreover, the absence of real-world benchmarks and holistic metrics hinders progress in the field. This paper presents a comprehensive frame-work to overcome these limitations. We first introduce SID-Bench, the first benchmark for semantic-aware interruption detection built entirely from real-world human dialogues. To provide a rigorous assessment of the responsiveness-robustness trade-off, we propose the Average Penalty Time (APT) metric, which assigns a temporal cost to both false alarms and late responses. Building on this framework, we design an LLM-based detection model optimized through a novel training paradigm to capture subtle semantic cues of intent. Experimental results show that our model significantly outperforms mainstream baselines, achieving a nearly threefold reduction in APT. By successfully resolving the long-standing tension between speed and stability, our work establishes a new state-of-the-art for intelligent interruption handling in SDS. To facilitate future research, SID-Bench and the associated code are available at: https://github.com/xkx-hub/SID-bench.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Speech Interruption Handling on SID-Bench Noise Silence 1.0](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/speech-interruption-handling-on-sid-bench-noise-silence-1-0.md>): Speech Interruption Handling; SID-Bench Noise Silence 1.0; FIR Score: 2.6.

- [Speech Interruption Handling on SID-Bench English 1.0](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/speech-interruption-handling-on-sid-bench-english-1-0.md>): Speech Interruption Handling; SID-Bench English 1.0; IRL: 0.444.

- [Speech Interruption Handling on SID-Bench Average 1.0 (All combined)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/speech-interruption-handling-on-sid-bench-average-1-0-all-combined.md>): Speech Interruption Handling; SID-Bench Average 1.0 (All combined); IRL: 0.389.

- [Speech Interruption Handling on SID-Bench Chinese 1.0](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/speech-interruption-handling-on-sid-bench-chinese-1-0.md>): Speech Interruption Handling; SID-Bench Chinese 1.0; IRL: 0.338.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24144>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.24144.pdf>)
