# Unified-MAS: Universally Generating Domain-Specific Nodes for Empowering Automatic Multi-Agent Systems Source: [Unified-MAS: Universally Generating Domain-Specific Nodes for Empowering Automatic Multi-Agent Systems]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-25T05:00:11.826Z Authors: Hehai Lin, Yu Yan, Zixuan Wang, Bo Xu, Sudong Wang, Weiquan Huang, Ruochen Zhao, Minzhi Li, Chengwei Qin Published: 2026-03-23T01:36:07.000Z ## Abstract Automatic Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) generation has emerged as a promising paradigm for solving complex reasoning tasks. However, existing frameworks are fundamentally bottlenecked when applied to knowledge-intensive domains (e.g., healthcare and law). They either rely on a static library of general nodes like Chain-of-Thought, which lack specialized expertise, or attempt to generate nodes on the fly. In the latter case, the orchestrator is not only bound by its internal knowledge limits but must also simultaneously generate domain-specific logic and optimize high-level topology, leading to a severe architectural coupling that degrades overall system efficacy. To bridge this gap, we propose Unified-MAS that decouples granular node implementation from topological orchestration via offline node synthesis. Unified-MAS operates in two stages: (1) Search-Based Node Generation retrieves external open-world knowledge to synthesize specialized node blueprints, overcoming the internal knowledge limits of LLMs; and (2) Reward-Based Node Optimization utilizes a perplexity-guided reward to iteratively enhance the internal logic of bottleneck nodes. Extensive experiments across four specialized domains demonstrate that integrating Unified-MAS into four Automatic-MAS baselines yields a better performance-cost trade-off, achieving up to a 14.2% gain while significantly reducing costs. Further analysis reveals its robustness across different designer LLMs and its effectiveness on conventional tasks such as mathematical reasoning. ## Recorded benchmark results A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. - [Mathematical Reasoning on AIME 2024 and 2025 (test)](): Mathematical Reasoning; AIME 2024 and 2025 (test); Overall Performance Rate: 67.35. ## Original sources and implementation [Original paper]() [PDF]()