# Satellite-to-Street: Synthesizing Post-Disaster Views from Satellite Imagery via Generative Vision Models

Source: [Satellite-to-Street: Synthesizing Post-Disaster Views from Satellite Imagery via Generative Vision Models](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c21a660636e5bf4afc465d>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-25T05:00:04.214Z

Authors: Yifan Yang, Lei Zou, Wendy Jepson

Published: 2026-03-21T07:47:33.000Z

## Abstract

In the immediate aftermath of natural disasters, rapid situational awareness is critical. Traditionally, satellite observations are widely used to estimate damage extent. However, they lack the ground-level perspective essential for characterizing specific structural failures and impacts. Meanwhile, ground-level data (e.g., street-view imagery) remains largely inaccessible during time-sensitive events. This study investigates Satellite-to-Street View Synthesis to bridge this data gap. We introduce two generative strategies to synthesize post-disaster street views from satellite imagery: a Vision-Language Model (VLM)-guided approach and a damage-sensitive Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) method. We benchmark these against general-purpose baselines (Pix2Pix, ControlNet) using a proposed Structure-Aware Evaluation Framework. This multi-tier protocol integrates (1) pixel-level quality assessment, (2) ResNet-based semantic consistency verification, and (3) a novel VLM-as-a-Judge for perceptual alignment. Experiments on 300 disaster scenarios reveal a critical realism--fidelity trade-off: while diffusion-based approaches (e.g., ControlNet) achieve high perceptual realism, they often hallucinate structural details. Quantitative results show that standard ControlNet achieves the highest semantic accuracy, 0.71, whereas VLM-enhanced and MoE models excel in textural plausibility but struggle with semantic clarity. This work establishes a baseline for trustworthy cross-view synthesis, emphasizing that visually realistic generations may still fail to preserve critical structural information required for reliable disaster assessment.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Satellite-to-Street-View Synthesis on Satellite-to-Street-View Disaster Dataset](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/satellite-to-street-view-synthesis-on-satellite-to-street-view-disaster-dataset.md>): Satellite-to-Street-View Synthesis; Satellite-to-Street-View Disaster Dataset; Structural Fidelity: 1.88.

- [Disaster Severity Classification on Synthesized Post-Disaster Street-View Images (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/disaster-severity-classification-on-synthesized-post-disaster-street-view-images-test.md>): Disaster Severity Classification; Synthesized Post-Disaster Street-View Images (test); Accuracy: 43.

- [Satellite-to-Street-View Image Synthesis on Hurricane Ian dataset](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/satellite-to-street-view-image-synthesis-on-hurricane-ian-dataset.md>): Satellite-to-Street-View Image Synthesis; Hurricane Ian dataset; SSIM: 29.1.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20697>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.20697.pdf>)
