# CA-HFP: Curvature-Aware Heterogeneous Federated Pruning with Model Reconstruction

Source: [CA-HFP: Curvature-Aware Heterogeneous Federated Pruning with Model Reconstruction](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-17T05:00:04.157Z

Authors: Gang Hu, Yinglei Teng, Pengfei Wu, Shijun Ma

Published: 2026-03-13T02:45:00.000Z

## Abstract

Federated learning on heterogeneous edge devices requires personalized compression while preserving aggregation compatibility and stable convergence. We present Curvature-Aware Heterogeneous Federated Pruning (CA-HFP), a practical framework that enables each client perform structured, device-specific pruning guided by a curvature-informed significance score, and subsequently maps its compact submodel back into a common global parameter space via a lightweight reconstruction. We derive a convergence bound for federated optimization with multiple local SGD steps that explicitly accounts for local computation, data heterogeneity, and pruning-induced perturbations; from which a principled loss-based pruning criterion is derived. Extensive experiments on FMNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 using VGG and ResNet architectures under varying degrees of data heterogeneity demonstrate that CA-HFP preserves model accuracy while significantly reducing per-client computation and communication costs, outperforming standard federated training and existing pruning-based baselines.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Image Classification on FMNIST (test) with Alpha-Weighted Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-fmnist-test-with-alpha-weighted-accuracy.md>): Image Classification; fMNIST (test); Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 89.

- [Image Classification on CIFAR100 (test) (Alpha-Weighted Accuracy)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar100-test-alpha-weighted-accuracy.md>): Image Classification; CIFAR100 (test); Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 56.27.

- [Image Classification on CIFAR10 (test) (Alpha-Weighted Accuracy)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar10-test-alpha-weighted-accuracy.md>): Image Classification; CIFAR10 (test); Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 73.12.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12591>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.12591.pdf>)
