# CTRL-RAG: Contrastive Likelihood Reward Based Reinforcement Learning for Context-Faithful RAG Models

Source: [CTRL-RAG: Contrastive Likelihood Reward Based Reinforcement Learning for Context-Faithful RAG Models](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69aa5f7b2d603e6de3e41845>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-07T05:00:04.447Z

Authors: Zhehao Tan, Yihan Jiao, Dan Yang, Junjie Wang, Duolin Sun, Jie Feng, Xidong Wang, Lei Liu, Yue Shen, Jian Wang, Jinjie Gu

Published: 2026-02-02T12:21:59.000Z

## Abstract

With the growing use of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), training large language models (LLMs) for context-sensitive reasoning and faithfulness is increasingly important. Existing RAG-oriented reinforcement learning (RL) methods rely on external rewards that often fail to evaluate document faithfulness, and may misjudge similar answers in open-domain settings. In addition, there is no RAG-based selfreward mechanism. Moreover, although such a mechanism could in principle estimate answer confidence given documents, the absence of objective feedback in a self-judgment can cause hallucination accumulation and eventual model collapse. To tackle these issues, we propose a novel "internal-external" hybrid reward framework centered on a Contrastive Likelihood Reward (CLR). CLR directly optimizes the log-likelihood gap between responses conditioned on prompts with and without supporting evidence. This encourages the model to extract relevant evidence and increases its confidence when grounded in a specific context. Experiments show that our method (used alone or combined with external correctness rewards) achieves strong performance on singlehop, multi-hop, vertical-domain, and faithfulness benchmarks. Our training code and models are coming soon.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering on RAGQA Leaderboard (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/retrieval-augmented-question-answering-on-ragqa-leaderboard-test.md>): Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering; RAGQA Leaderboard (test); AVG Score: 85.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04406>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.04406.pdf>)
