# Goal-Oriented Influence-Maximizing Data Acquisition for Learning and Optimization

Source: [Goal-Oriented Influence-Maximizing Data Acquisition for Learning and Optimization](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/699d30a06017c4460ffab511>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-25T05:00:07.533Z

Authors: Weichi Yao, Bianca Dumitrascu, Bryan R. Goldsmith, Yixin Wang

Published: 2026-02-23T07:57:11.000Z

## Abstract

Active data acquisition is central to many learning and optimization tasks in deep neural networks, yet remains challenging because most approaches rely on predictive uncertainty estimates that are difficult to obtain reliably. To this end, we propose Goal-Oriented Influence- Maximizing Data Acquisition (GOIMDA), an active acquisition algorithm that avoids explicit posterior inference while remaining uncertainty-aware through inverse curvature. GOIMDA selects inputs by maximizing their expected influence on a user-specified goal functional, such as test loss, predictive entropy, or the value of an optimizer-recommended design. Leveraging first-order influence functions, we derive a tractable acquisition rule that combines the goal gradient, training-loss curvature, and candidate sensitivity to model parameters. We show theoretically that, for generalized linear models, GOIMDA approximates predictive-entropy minimization up to a correction term accounting for goal alignment and prediction bias, thereby, yielding uncertainty-aware behavior without maintaining a Bayesian posterior. Empirically, across learning tasks (including image and text classification) and optimization tasks (including noisy global optimization benchmarks and neural-network hyperparameter tuning), GOIMDA consistently reaches target performance with substantially fewer labeled samples or function evaluations than uncertainty-based active learning and Gaussian-process Bayesian optimization baselines.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Image Classification on MNIST (Data Sample Requirements Percentiles)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-mnist-data-sample-requirements-percentiles.md>): Image Classification; MNIST; Data Required (25th Percentile): 88.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19578>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.19578.pdf>)
