# HyperMLP: An Integrated Perspective for Sequence Modeling

Source: [HyperMLP: An Integrated Perspective for Sequence Modeling](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6992a4599ebc499c97406aa5>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-17T05:00:04.915Z

Authors: Jiecheng Lu, Shihao Yang

Published: 2026-02-13T04:20:10.000Z

## Abstract

Self-attention is often viewed as probabilistic query-key lookup, motivating designs that preserve normalized attention scores and fixed positional semantics. We advocate a simpler and more unified perspective: an autoregressive attention head can be viewed as a dynamic two-layer MLP whose weights are instantiated from the context history. From this view, attention scores form an ever-growing hidden representation, and standard MLP activations such as ReLU or GLU naturally implement input-conditioned selection over a context-dependent memory pool rather than a probability distribution. Based on this formulation, we introduce HyperMLP and HyperGLU, which learn dynamic mixing in both feature space and sequence space, using a reverse-offset (lag) layout to align temporal mixing with autoregressive semantics. We provide theoretical characterizations of the expressivity and implications of this structure, and empirically show that HyperMLP/HyperGLU consistently outperform strong softmax-attention baselines under matched parameter budgets.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Language Modeling on Open LLM Leaderboard Unified General Ability Suite (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/language-modeling-on-open-llm-leaderboard-unified-general-ability-suite-test.md>): Language Modeling; Open LLM Leaderboard & General Ability Benchmarks (MMLU-P, GPQA, BBH, MATH, MuSR, IFEval, ARC, Hellaswag, PIQA, BoolQ, WinoGrande, COPA, OpenBookQA, SciQ) unified (test); MMLU-P Accuracy: 12.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12601>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.12601.pdf>)
