# Synthetic FMCW Radar Range Azimuth Maps Augmentation with Generative Diffusion Model

Source: [Synthetic FMCW Radar Range Azimuth Maps Augmentation with Generative Diffusion Model](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6965d1866343fa78c832355d>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-01-14T05:00:04.658Z

Authors: Zhaoze Wang, Changxu Zhang, Tai Fei, Christopher Grimm, Yi Jin, Claas Tebruegge, Ernst Warsitz, Markus Gardill

Published: 2026-01-09T10:59:46.000Z

## Abstract

The scarcity and low diversity of well-annotated automotive radar datasets often limit the performance of deep-learning-based environmental perception. To overcome these challenges, we propose a conditional generative framework for synthesizing realistic Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave radar Range-Azimuth Maps. Our approach leverages a generative diffusion model to generate radar data for multiple object categories, including pedestrians, cars, and cyclists. Specifically, conditioning is achieved via Confidence Maps, where each channel represents a semantic class and encodes Gaussian-distributed annotations at target locations. To address radar-specific characteristics, we incorporate Geometry Aware Conditioning and Temporal Consistency Regularization into the generative process. Experiments on the ROD2021 dataset demonstrate that signal reconstruction quality improves by \\SI{3.6}{dB} in Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio over baseline methods, while training with a combination of real and synthetic datasets improves overall mean Average Precision by 4.15% compared with conventional image-processing-based augmentation. These results indicate that our generative framework not only produces physically plausible and diverse radar spectrum but also substantially improves model generalization in downstream tasks.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Radar Object Detection on ROD 2021 (Campus Road)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/radar-object-detection-on-rod-2021-campus-road.md>): Radar Object Detection; ROD 2021 (Campus Road); mAP: 36.95.

- [Radar Object Detection on ROD City Street 2021](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/radar-object-detection-on-rod-city-street-2021.md>): Radar Object Detection; ROD City Street 2021; mAP: 21.01.

- [Radar Object Detection on ROD Highway 2021](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/radar-object-detection-on-rod-highway-2021.md>): Radar Object Detection; ROD Highway 2021; mAP: 0.3382.

- [Radar Object Detection on ROD 2021](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/radar-object-detection-on-rod-2021.md>): Radar Object Detection; ROD 2021; mAP: 0.3565.

- [Radar Object Detection on ROD Parking Lot 2021](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/radar-object-detection-on-rod-parking-lot-2021.md>): Radar Object Detection; ROD Parking Lot 2021; mAP: 57.35.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06228>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.06228.pdf>)
