# FedSCAM (Federated Sharpness-Aware Minimization with Clustered Aggregation and Modulation): Scam-resistant SAM for Robust Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Environments Source: [FedSCAM (Federated Sharpness-Aware Minimization with Clustered Aggregation and Modulation): Scam-resistant SAM for Robust Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Environments]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-01-07T05:00:04.580Z Authors: Sameer Rahil, Zain Abdullah Ahmad, Talha Asif Published: 2025-12-29T19:42:50.000Z ## Abstract Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across decentralized edge devices while preserving data privacy. However, statistical heterogeneity among clients, often manifested as non-IID label distributions, poses significant challenges to convergence and generalization. While Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has been introduced to FL to seek flatter, more robust minima, existing approaches typically apply a uniform perturbation radius across all clients, ignoring client-specific heterogeneity. In this work, we propose \\textbf{FedSCAM} (Federated Sharpness-Aware Minimization with Clustered Aggregation and Modulation), a novel algorithm that dynamically adjusts the SAM perturbation radius and aggregation weights based on client-specific heterogeneity scores. By calculating a heterogeneity metric for each client and modulating the perturbation radius inversely to this score, FedSCAM prevents clients with high variance from destabilizing the global model. Furthermore, we introduce a heterogeneity-aware weighted aggregation mechanism that prioritizes updates from clients that align with the global optimization direction. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and Fashion-MNIST under various degrees of Dirichlet-based label skew demonstrate that FedSCAM achieves competitive performance among state-of-the-art baselines, including FedSAM, FedLESAM, etc. in terms of convergence speed and final test accuracy. ## Recorded benchmark results A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. - [Image Classification on Fashion-MNIST alpha=0.1 (test)](): Image Classification; Fashion-MNIST alpha=0.1 (test); Accuracy: 65.41. - [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test)](): Image Classification; CIFAR-10 (test); Accuracy: 70.63. ## Original sources and implementation [Original paper]() [PDF]()