# Dual-Qubit Hierarchical Fuzzy Neural Network for Image Classification: Enabling Relational Learning via Quantum Entanglement

Source: [Dual-Qubit Hierarchical Fuzzy Neural Network for Image Classification: Enabling Relational Learning via Quantum Entanglement](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6940e7b3456146936284f9a6>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-12-17T05:04:46.379Z

Authors: Wenwei Zhang, Jintao Wang, Tianyu Ye, Changgeng Liao

Published: 2025-12-15T12:35:53.000Z

## Abstract

Classical deep neural network models struggle to represent data uncertainty and capture dependencies between features simultaneously, especially under fuzzy or noisy conditions. Although a quantum-assisted hierarchical fuzzy neural network (QA-HFNN) was proposed to learn fuzzy membership for each feature, it cannot model dependencies between features due to its single-qubit encoding. To address this, this paper proposes a dual-qubit hierarchical fuzzy neural network (DQ-HFNN), encoding feature pairs onto a pair of entangled qubits, which extends the single-feature fuzzy model to a joint fuzzy representation. By introducing quantum entanglement, the dual-qubit circuit can encode non-classical correlations, enabling the model to directly learn relationship patterns between feature pairs. Experiments on benchmarks show that DQ-HFNN demonstrates higher classification accuracy than QA-HFNN, as well as classical deep learning baselines. Furthermore, ablation studies after controlling for circuit depth and parameter counts show that the performance gain mainly stems from the relational modeling capability enabled by entanglement rather than enhanced expressivity. The proposed DQ-HFNN model exhibits high parameter efficiency and fast inference speed. Experiments under noisy conditions suggest that it is robust against noise and has the potential to be implemented on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13274>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.13274.pdf>)
