# DAMASHA: Detecting AI in Mixed Adversarial Texts via Segmentation with Human-interpretable Attribution

Source: [DAMASHA: Detecting AI in Mixed Adversarial Texts via Segmentation with Human-interpretable Attribution](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69326709d6b0dd334293429f>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-01-07T05:00:04.580Z

Authors: L. D. M. S. Sai Teja, N. Siva Gopala Krishna, Ufaq Khan, Muhammad Haris Khan, Atul Mishra

Published: 2025-12-04T14:21:42.000Z

## Abstract

In the age of advanced large language models (LLMs), the boundaries between human and AI-generated text are becoming increasingly blurred. We address the challenge of segmenting mixed-authorship text, that is identifying transition points in text where authorship shifts from human to AI or vice-versa, a problem with critical implications for authenticity, trust, and human oversight. We introduce a novel framework, called Info-Mask for mixed authorship detection that integrates stylometric cues, perplexity-driven signals, and structured boundary modeling to accurately segment collaborative human-AI content. To evaluate the robustness of our system against adversarial perturbations, we construct and release an adversarial benchmark dataset Mixed-text Adversarial setting for Segmentation (MAS), designed to probe the limits of existing detectors. Beyond segmentation accuracy, we introduce Human-Interpretable Attribution (HIA overlays that highlight how stylometric features inform boundary predictions, and we conduct a small-scale human study assessing their usefulness. Across multiple architectures, Info-Mask significantly improves span-level robustness under adversarial conditions, establishing new baselines while revealing remaining challenges. Our findings highlight both the promise and limitations of adversarially robust, interpretable mixed-authorship detection, with implications for trust and oversight in human-AI co-authorship.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Authorship segmentation on MAS (entire corpus)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/authorship-segmentation-on-mas-entire-corpus.md>): Authorship segmentation; MAS (entire corpus); SBDA @ 0.3: 45.7.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04838>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.04838.pdf>)
