# WearVQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark for Wearables in Egocentric Authentic Real-world scenarios

Source: [WearVQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark for Wearables in Egocentric Authentic Real-world scenarios](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/692d210ad6b0dd334293163b>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-12-04T05:01:31.288Z

Authors: Eun Chang, Zhuangqun Huang, Yiwei Liao, Sagar Ravi Bhavsar, Amogh Param, Tammy Stark, Adel Ahmadyan, Xiao Yang, Jiaqi Wang, Ahsan Abdullah, Giang Nguyen, Akil Iyer, David Hall, Elissa Li, Shane Moon, Nicolas Scheffer, Kirmani Ahmed, Babak Damavandi, Rakesh Wanga, Anuj Kumar, Rohit Patel, Xin Luna Dong

Published: 2025-11-27T06:44:49.000Z

## Abstract

We introduce WearVQA, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the Visual Question Answering (VQA) capabilities of multi-model AI assistant on wearable devices like smart glasses. Unlike prior benchmarks that focus on high-quality, third-person imagery, WearVQA reflects the unique challenges of ego-centric interaction-where visual inputs may be occluded, poorly lit, unzoomed, or blurry, and questions are grounded in realistic wearable use cases. The benchmark comprises 2,520 carefully curated image-question-answer triplets, spanning 7 diverse image domains including both text-centric and general scenes, 10 cognitive task types ranging from basic recognition to various forms of reasoning, and 6 common wearables-specific image quality issues. All questions are designed to be answerable using only the visual input and common senses. WearVQA is paired with a rigorous LLM-as-a-judge evaluation framework with 96% labeling accuracy. Open-source and proprietary multi-model LLMs achieved a QA accuracy as low as 24-52% on WearVQA, with substantial drops on lower-quality images and reasoning-heavy tasks. These observations position WearVQA as a comprehensive and challenging benchmark for guiding technical advancement towards robust, real-world multi-model wearables AI systems.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22154>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.22154.pdf>)