# A cross-species neural foundation model for end-to-end speech decoding

Source: [A cross-species neural foundation model for end-to-end speech decoding](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/692d20e5d6b0dd3342931455>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-16T05:00:05.655Z

Authors: Yizi Zhang, Linyang He, Chaofei Fan, Tingkai Liu, Han Yu, Trung Le, Jingyuan Li, Scott Linderman, Lea Duncker, Francis R Willett, Nima Mesgarani, Liam Paninski

Published: 2025-11-21T21:25:54.000Z

## Abstract

Speech brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) aim to restore communication for people with paralysis by translating neural activity into text. Most systems use cascaded frameworks that decode phonemes before assembling sentences with an n-gram language model (LM), preventing joint optimization of all stages simultaneously. Here, we introduce an end-to-end BraIn-to-Text (BIT) framework that translates neural activity into coherent sentences using a single differentiable neural network. Central to our approach is a cross-task, cross-species pretrained neural encoder, whose representations transfer to both attempted and imagined speech. In a cascaded setting with an n-gram LM, the pretrained encoder establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) on the Brain-to-Text '24 and '25 benchmarks. Integrated end-to-end with audio large language models (LLMs) and trained with contrastive learning for cross-modal alignment, BIT reduces the word error rate (WER) of the prior end-to-end method from 24.69% to 10.22%. Notably, we find that small-scale audio LLMs markedly improve end-to-end decoding. Beyond record-setting performance, BIT aligns attempted and imagined speech embeddings to enable cross-task generalization. Altogether, our approach advances the integration of large, diverse neural datasets, paving the way for an end-to-end decoding framework that supports seamless, differentiable optimization.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Speech Decoding on Brain-to-Text 2024 (hold-out)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/speech-decoding-on-brain-to-text-2024-hold-out.md>): Speech Decoding; Brain-to-Text 2024 (hold-out); WER: 5.1.

- [Brain-to-Text on Brain-to-Text 2025 (hold-out set)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/brain-to-text-on-brain-to-text-2025-hold-out-set.md>): Brain-to-Text; Brain-to-Text 2025 (hold-out set); WER: 1.76.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21740>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.21740.pdf>)
