# Testing Question Answering Software with Context-Driven Question Generation

Source: [Testing Question Answering Software with Context-Driven Question Generation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/691414762828b7cc6937e9bc>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-11-13T05:02:18.359Z

Authors: Shuang Liu, Zhirun Zhang, Jinhao Dong, Zan Wang, Qingchao Shen, Junjie Chen, Wei Lu, Xiaoyong Du

Published: 2025-11-11T07:22:58.000Z

## Abstract

Question-answering software is becoming increasingly integrated into our daily lives, with prominent examples including Apple Siri and Amazon Alexa. Ensuring the quality of such systems is critical, as incorrect answers could lead to significant harm. Current state-of-the-art testing approaches apply metamorphic relations to existing test datasets, generating test questions based on these relations. However, these methods have two key limitations. First, they often produce unnatural questions that humans are unlikely to ask, reducing the effectiveness of the generated questions in identifying bugs that might occur in real-world scenarios. Second, these questions are generated from pre-existing test datasets, ignoring the broader context and thus limiting the diversity and relevance of the generated questions.   In this work, we introduce CQ^2A, a context-driven question generation approach for testing question-answering systems. Specifically, CQ^2A extracts entities and relationships from the context to form ground truth answers, and utilizes large language models to generate questions based on these ground truth answers and the surrounding context. We also propose the consistency verification and constraint checking to increase the reliability of LLM's outputs. Experiments conducted on three datasets demonstrate that CQ^2A outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on the bug detection capability, the naturalness of the generated questions as well as the coverage of the context. Moreover, the test cases generated by CQ^2A reduce error rate when utilized for fine-tuning the QA software under test

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07924>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.07924.pdf>)