# SECA: Semantically Equivalent and Coherent Attacks for Eliciting LLM Hallucinations

Source: [SECA: Semantically Equivalent and Coherent Attacks for Eliciting LLM Hallucinations](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7be01e209131cea8af6e>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-18T05:00:15.522Z

Authors: Buyun Liang, Liangzu Peng, Jinqi Luo, Darshan Thaker, Kwan Ho Ryan Chan, Ren\\'e Vidal

Published: 2025-10-05T23:44:54.000Z

## Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-risk domains. However, state-of-the-art LLMs often exhibit hallucinations, raising serious concerns about their reliability. Prior work has explored adversarial attacks to elicit hallucinations in LLMs, but these methods often rely on unrealistic prompts, either by inserting nonsensical tokens or by altering the original semantic intent. Consequently, such approaches provide limited insight into how hallucinations arise in real-world settings. In contrast, adversarial attacks in computer vision typically involve realistic modifications to input images. However, the problem of identifying realistic adversarial prompts for eliciting LLM hallucinations remains largely underexplored. To address this gap, we propose Semantically Equivalent and Coherent Attacks (SECA), which elicit hallucinations via realistic modifications to the prompt that preserve its meaning while maintaining semantic coherence. Our contributions are threefold: (i) we formulate finding realistic attacks for hallucination elicitation as a constrained optimization problem over the input prompt space under semantic equivalence and coherence constraints; (ii) we introduce a constraint-preserving zeroth-order method to effectively search for adversarial yet feasible prompts; and (iii) we demonstrate through experiments on open-ended multiple-choice question answering tasks that SECA achieves higher attack success rates while incurring almost no semantic equivalence or semantic coherence errors compared to existing methods. SECA highlights the sensitivity of both open-source and commercial gradient-inaccessible LLMs to realistic and plausible prompt variations. Code is available at https://github.com/Buyun-Liang/SECA.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Adversarial Attack on MMLU 16 subjects filtered subset](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/adversarial-attack-on-mmlu-16-subjects-filtered-subset.md>): Adversarial Attack; MMLU 16 subjects filtered subset; ASR@30: 81.24.

- [Open-ended MCQA on MMLU (16 subjects filtered)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/open-ended-mcqa-on-mmlu-16-subjects-filtered.md>): Open-ended MCQA; MMLU 16 subjects filtered; ASR@30: 82.97.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04398>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.04398.pdf>)
