# NuRisk: A Visual Question Answering Dataset for Agent-Level Risk Assessment in Autonomous Driving

Source: [NuRisk: A Visual Question Answering Dataset for Agent-Level Risk Assessment in Autonomous Driving](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bc91e209131cea8a782>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-22T05:22:24.042Z

Authors: Yuan Gao, Mattia Piccinini, Roberto Brusnicki, Yuchen Zhang, Johannes Betz

Published: 2025-09-30T08:37:31.000Z

## Abstract

Understanding risk in autonomous driving requires not only perception and prediction, but also high-level reasoning about agent behavior and context. Current Vision Language Model (VLM)-based methods primarily ground agents in static images and provide qualitative judgments, lacking the spatio-temporal reasoning needed to capture how risks evolve over time. To address this gap, we propose NuRisk, a comprehensive Visual Question Answering (VQA) dataset comprising 2.9K scenarios and 1.1M agent-level samples, built on real-world data from nuScenes and Waymo, completed with safety-critical scenarios from the CommonRoad simulator. The dataset provides Bird's-eye view (BEV) based sequential images with quantitative, agent-level risk annotations, enabling spatio-temporal reasoning. We benchmark well-known VLMs across different prompting techniques and find that they fail to perform explicit spatio-temporal reasoning, resulting in a peak accuracy of 33% at high latency. To address these shortcomings, our fine-tuned 7B VLM agent improves accuracy to 41% and reduces latency by 75%, demonstrating explicit spatio-temporal reasoning capabilities that proprietary models lacked. While this represents a significant step forward, the modest accuracy underscores the profound challenge of the task, establishing NuRisk as a critical benchmark for advancing spatio-temporal reasoning in autonomous driving. More information can be found at https://github.com/TUM-AVS/NuRisk.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25944>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.25944.pdf>)
