# Thread: A Logic-Based Data Organization Paradigm for How-To Question Answering with Retrieval Augmented Generation

Source: [Thread: A Logic-Based Data Organization Paradigm for How-To Question Answering with Retrieval Augmented Generation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7ba01e209131cea89672>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T05:44:27.003Z

Authors: Kaikai An, Fangkai Yang, Liqun Li, Junting Lu, Sitao Cheng, Shuzheng Si, Lu Wang, Pu Zhao, Lele Cao, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang, Baobao Chang

Published: 2024-06-19T09:14:41.000Z

## Abstract

Recent advances in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have substantially improved question-answering systems, particularly for factoid '5Ws' questions. However, significant challenges remain when addressing '1H' questions, specifically how-to questions, which are integral for decision-making and require dynamic, step-by-step responses. The key limitation lies in the prevalent data organization paradigm, chunk, which commonly divides documents into fixed-size segments, and disrupts the logical coherence and connections within the context. To address this, we propose Thread, a novel data organization paradigm enabling systems to handle how-to questions more effectively. Specifically, we introduce a new knowledge granularity, 'logic unit' (LU), where large language models transform documents into more structured and loosely interconnected LUs. Extensive experiments across both open-domain and industrial settings show that Thread outperforms existing paradigms significantly, improving the success rate of handling how-to questions by 21% to 33%. Additionally, Thread demonstrates high adaptability across diverse document formats, reducing retrieval information by up to 75% compared to chunk, and also shows better generalizability to '5Ws' questions, such as multi-hop questions, outperforming other paradigms.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13372>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13372.pdf>)
