# Rationale-Guided Retrieval Augmented Generation for Medical Question Answering

Source: [Rationale-Guided Retrieval Augmented Generation for Medical Question Answering](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7b891e209131cea88f73>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-28T13:57:22.020Z

Authors: Jiwoong Sohn, Yein Park, Chanwoong Yoon, Sihyeon Park, Hyeon Hwang, Mujeen Sung, Hyunjae Kim, Jaewoo Kang

Published: 2024-11-01T01:40:23.000Z

## Abstract

Large language models (LLM) hold significant potential for applications in biomedicine, but they struggle with hallucinations and outdated knowledge. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is generally employed to address these issues, it also has its own set of challenges: (1) LLMs are vulnerable to irrelevant or incorrect context, (2) medical queries are often not well-targeted for helpful information, and (3) retrievers are prone to bias toward the specific source corpus they were trained on. In this study, we present RAG$^2$ (RAtionale-Guided RAG), a new framework for enhancing the reliability of RAG in biomedical contexts. RAG$^2$ incorporates three key innovations: a small filtering model trained on perplexity-based labels of rationales, which selectively augments informative snippets of documents while filtering out distractors; LLM-generated rationales as queries to improve the utility of retrieved snippets; a structure designed to retrieve snippets evenly from a comprehensive set of four biomedical corpora, effectively mitigating retriever bias. Our experiments demonstrate that RAG$^2$ improves the state-of-the-art LLMs of varying sizes, with improvements of up to 6.1\\%, and it outperforms the previous best medical RAG model by up to 5.6\\% across three medical question-answering benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/dmis-lab/RAG2.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00300>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.00300.pdf>)
