# Are Smaller Open-Weight LLMs Closing the Gap to Proprietary Models for Biomedical Question Answering?

Source: [Are Smaller Open-Weight LLMs Closing the Gap to Proprietary Models for Biomedical Question Answering?](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7b811e209131cea88bda>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T05:41:29.127Z

Authors: Damian Stachura, Joanna Konieczna, Artur Nowak

Published: 2025-09-23T09:27:57.000Z

## Abstract

Open-weight versions of large language models (LLMs) are rapidly advancing, with state-of-the-art models like DeepSeek-V3 now performing comparably to proprietary LLMs. This progression raises the question of whether small open-weight LLMs are capable of effectively replacing larger closed-source models. We are particularly interested in the context of biomedical question-answering, a domain we explored by participating in Task 13B Phase B of the BioASQ challenge. In this work, we compare several open-weight models against top-performing systems such as GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.7 Sonnet. To enhance question answering capabilities, we use various techniques including retrieving the most relevant snippets based on embedding distance, in-context learning, and structured outputs. For certain submissions, we utilize ensemble approaches to leverage the diverse outputs generated by different models for exact-answer questions. Our results demonstrate that open-weight LLMs are comparable to proprietary ones. In some instances, open-weight LLMs even surpassed their closed counterparts, particularly when ensembling strategies were applied. All code is publicly available at https://github.com/evidenceprime/BioASQ-13b.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18843>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.18843.pdf>)
