# LoRA in LoRA: Towards Parameter-Efficient Architecture Expansion for Continual Visual Instruction Tuning

Source: [LoRA in LoRA: Towards Parameter-Efficient Architecture Expansion for Continual Visual Instruction Tuning](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a881e209131cea83bd1>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-16T05:00:05.655Z

Authors: Chang Che, Ziqi Wang, Pengwan Yang, Qi Wang, Hui Ma, Zenglin Shi

Published: 2025-08-08T10:32:38.000Z

## Abstract

Continual Visual Instruction Tuning (CVIT) enables Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to incrementally learn new tasks over time. However, this process is challenged by catastrophic forgetting, where performance on previously learned tasks deteriorates as the model adapts to new ones. A common approach to mitigate forgetting is architecture expansion, which introduces task-specific modules to prevent interference. Yet, existing methods often expand entire layers for each task, leading to significant parameter overhead and poor scalability. To overcome these issues, we introduce LoRA in LoRA (LiLoRA), a highly efficient architecture expansion method tailored for CVIT in MLLMs. LiLoRA shares the LoRA matrix A across tasks to reduce redundancy, applies an additional low-rank decomposition to matrix B to minimize task-specific parameters, and incorporates a cosine-regularized stability loss to preserve consistency in shared representations over time. Extensive experiments on a diverse CVIT benchmark show that LiLoRA consistently achieves superior performance in sequential task learning while significantly improving parameter efficiency compared to existing approaches. The code is available at https://github.com/chanceche/LiLoRA.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Continual Visual Instruction Tuning on CVIT Single-type instruction](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/continual-visual-instruction-tuning-on-cvit-single-type-instruction.md>): Continual Visual Instruction Tuning; CVIT Single-type instruction; AP (Average Precision): 84.88.

- [Continual Visual Instruction Tuning on CVIT Five-type instruction](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/continual-visual-instruction-tuning-on-cvit-five-type-instruction.md>): Continual Visual Instruction Tuning; CVIT Five-type instruction; ScienceQA Score: 78.38.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06202>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.06202.pdf>)
