# ObfusQAte: A Proposed Framework to Evaluate LLM Robustness on Obfuscated Factual Question Answering

Source: [ObfusQAte: A Proposed Framework to Evaluate LLM Robustness on Obfuscated Factual Question Answering](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7a811e209131cea838c6>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-06T05:00:05.533Z

Authors: Shubhra Ghosh, Abhilekh Borah, Aditya Kumar Guru, Kripabandhu Ghosh

Published: 2025-08-10T12:27:52.000Z

## Abstract

The rapid proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly contributed to the development of equitable AI systems capable of factual question-answering (QA). However, no known study tests the LLMs' robustness when presented with obfuscated versions of questions. To systematically evaluate these limitations, we propose a novel technique, ObfusQAte, and leveraging the same, introduce ObfusQA, a comprehensive, first-of-its-kind framework with multi-tiered obfuscation levels designed to examine LLM capabilities across three distinct dimensions: (i) Named-Entity Indirection, (ii) Distractor Indirection, and (iii) Contextual Overload. By capturing these fine-grained distinctions in language, ObfusQA provides a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLM robustness and adaptability. Our study observes that LLMs exhibit a tendency to fail or generate hallucinated responses when confronted with these increasingly nuanced variations. To foster research in this direction, we make ObfusQAte publicly available.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07321>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.07321.pdf>)
