# Long-Short Chain-of-Thought Mixture Supervised Fine-Tuning Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models

Source: [Long-Short Chain-of-Thought Mixture Supervised Fine-Tuning Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78a41e209131cea798b7>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T04:43:14.257Z

Authors: Bin Yu, Hang Yuan, Haotian Li, Xueyin Xu, Yuliang Wei, Bailing Wang, Weizhen Qi, Kai Chen

Published: 2025-05-06T12:18:11.000Z

## Abstract

Recent advances in large language models have demonstrated that Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning data distilled from large reasoning models (e.g., DeepSeek R1) can effectively transfer reasoning capabilities to non-reasoning models. However, models fine-tuned with this approach inherit the "overthinking" problem from teacher models, producing verbose and redundant reasoning chains during inference. To address this challenge, we propose Long-Short Chain-of-Thought Mixture Supervised Fine-Tuning (LS-Mixture SFT), which combines long CoT reasoning dataset with their short counterparts obtained through structure-preserved rewriting. Our experiments demonstrate that models trained using the LS-Mixture SFT method, compared to those trained with direct SFT, achieved an average accuracy improvement of 2.3% across various benchmarks while substantially reducing model response length by approximately 47.61%. This work offers an approach to endow non-reasoning models with reasoning capabilities through supervised fine-tuning while avoiding the inherent overthinking problems inherited from teacher models, thereby enabling efficient reasoning in the fine-tuned models.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Mathematical Reasoning on MATH 500 (Acc, Tokens, EFF)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/mathematical-reasoning-on-math-500-acc-tokens-eff.md>): Mathematical Reasoning; MATH 500; Accuracy: 94.6.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03469>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.03469.pdf>)
