# NoTeS-Bank: Benchmarking Neural Transcription and Search for Scientific Notes Understanding

Source: [NoTeS-Bank: Benchmarking Neural Transcription and Search for Scientific Notes Understanding](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77ec1e209131cea760c5>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T04:29:27.078Z

Authors: Aniket Pal, Sanket Biswas, Alloy Das, Ayush Lodh, Priyanka Banerjee, Soumitri Chattopadhyay, Dimosthenis Karatzas, Josep Llados, C.V. Jawahar

Published: 2025-04-12T15:11:32.000Z

## Abstract

Understanding and reasoning over academic handwritten notes remains a challenge in document AI, particularly for mathematical equations, diagrams, and scientific notations. Existing visual question answering (VQA) benchmarks focus on printed or structured handwritten text, limiting generalization to real-world note-taking. To address this, we introduce NoTeS-Bank, an evaluation benchmark for Neural Transcription and Search in note-based question answering. NoTeS-Bank comprises complex notes across multiple domains, requiring models to process unstructured and multimodal content. The benchmark defines two tasks: (1) Evidence-Based VQA, where models retrieve localized answers with bounding-box evidence, and (2) Open-Domain VQA, where models classify the domain before retrieving relevant documents and answers. Unlike classical Document VQA datasets relying on optical character recognition (OCR) and structured data, NoTeS-BANK demands vision-language fusion, retrieval, and multimodal reasoning. We benchmark state-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and retrieval frameworks, exposing structured transcription and reasoning limitations. NoTeS-Bank provides a rigorous evaluation with NDCG@5, MRR, Recall@K, IoU, and ANLS, establishing a new standard for visual document understanding and reasoning.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09249>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.09249.pdf>)
