# CLEV: LLM-Based Evaluation Through Lightweight Efficient Voting for Free-Form Question-Answering

Source: [CLEV: LLM-Based Evaluation Through Lightweight Efficient Voting for Free-Form Question-Answering](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77631e209131cea72f3e>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-11-13T05:01:23.491Z

Authors: Sher Badshah, Moamen Moustafa, Hassan Sajjad

Published: 2025-03-11T15:29:55.000Z

## Abstract

Evaluating free-form Question Answering (QA) remains a challenge due to its diverse and open-ended nature. Traditional automatic metrics fail to capture semantic equivalence or accommodate the variability of open-ended responses. Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) as evaluators offers a promising alternative due to their strong language understanding and instruction-following capabilities. We propose Consensus via Lightweight Efficient Voting (CLEV), which employs two primary LLMs as judges and invokes a third judge only in cases of disagreement. This approach prioritizes evaluation reliability while reducing unnecessary computational demands. Through experiments, including human evaluation, we demonstrate CLEV's ability to provide consistent, scalable, and resource-efficient assessments, establishing it as a robust framework for evaluating LLMs on free-form QA.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08542>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.08542.pdf>)
