# Multi-scale and Multi-path Cascaded Convolutional Network for Semantic Segmentation of Colorectal Polyps

Source: [Multi-scale and Multi-path Cascaded Convolutional Network for Semantic Segmentation of Colorectal Polyps](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75f81e209131cea6ab92>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T03:44:34.944Z

Authors: Malik Abdul Manan, Feng Jinchao, Muhammad Yaqub, Shahzad Ahmed, Syed Muhammad Ali Imran, Imran Shabir Chuhan, Haroon Ahmed Khan

Published: 2024-12-03T13:27:51.000Z

## Abstract

Colorectal polyps are structural abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract that can potentially become cancerous in some cases. The study introduces a novel framework for colorectal polyp segmentation named the Multi-Scale and Multi-Path Cascaded Convolution Network (MMCC-Net), aimed at addressing the limitations of existing models, such as inadequate spatial dependence representation and the absence of multi-level feature integration during the decoding stage by integrating multi-scale and multi-path cascaded convolutional techniques and enhances feature aggregation through dual attention modules, skip connections, and a feature enhancer. MMCC-Net achieves superior performance in identifying polyp areas at the pixel level. The Proposed MMCC-Net was tested across six public datasets and compared against eight SOTA models to demonstrate its efficiency in polyp segmentation. The MMCC-Net's performance shows Dice scores with confidence intervals ranging between (77.08, 77.56) and (94.19, 94.71) and Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU) scores with confidence intervals ranging from (72.20, 73.00) to (89.69, 90.53) on the six databases. These results highlight the model's potential as a powerful tool for accurate and efficient polyp segmentation, contributing to early detection and prevention strategies in colorectal cancer.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02443>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.02443.pdf>)
