# Towards Semi-supervised Dual-modal Semantic Segmentation

Source: [Towards Semi-supervised Dual-modal Semantic Segmentation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa74e41e209131cea647b2>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T03:21:26.418Z

Authors: Qiulei Dong, Jianan Li, Shuang Deng

Published: 2024-09-20T08:34:34.000Z

## Abstract

With the development of 3D and 2D data acquisition techniques, it has become easy to obtain point clouds and images of scenes simultaneously, which further facilitates dual-modal semantic segmentation. Most existing methods for simultaneously segmenting point clouds and images rely heavily on the quantity and quality of the labeled training data. However, massive point-wise and pixel-wise labeling procedures are time-consuming and labor-intensive. To address this issue, we propose a parallel dual-stream network to handle the semi-supervised dual-modal semantic segmentation task, called PD-Net, by jointly utilizing a small number of labeled point clouds, a large number of unlabeled point clouds, and unlabeled images. The proposed PD-Net consists of two parallel streams (called original stream and pseudo-label prediction stream). The pseudo-label prediction stream predicts the pseudo labels of unlabeled point clouds and their corresponding images. Then, the unlabeled data is sent to the original stream for self-training. Each stream contains two encoder-decoder branches for 3D and 2D data respectively. In each stream, multiple dual-modal fusion modules are explored for fusing the dual-modal features. In addition, a pseudo-label optimization module is explored to optimize the pseudo labels output by the pseudo-label prediction stream. Experimental results on two public datasets demonstrate that the proposed PD-Net not only outperforms the comparative semi-supervised methods but also achieves competitive performances with some fully-supervised methods in most cases.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13325>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.13325.pdf>)
