# CLIP-DPO: Vision-Language Models as a Source of Preference for Fixing Hallucinations in LVLMs

Source: [CLIP-DPO: Vision-Language Models as a Source of Preference for Fixing Hallucinations in LVLMs](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa74831e209131cea62173>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T03:11:37.234Z

Authors: Yassine Ouali, Adrian Bulat, Brais Martinez, Georgios Tzimiropoulos

Published: 2024-08-19T21:56:20.000Z

## Abstract

Despite recent successes, LVLMs or Large Vision Language Models are prone to hallucinating details like objects and their properties or relations, limiting their real-world deployment. To address this and improve their robustness, we present CLIP-DPO, a preference optimization method that leverages contrastively pre-trained Vision-Language (VL) embedding models, such as CLIP, for DPO-based optimization of LVLMs. Unlike prior works tackling LVLM hallucinations, our method does not rely on paid-for APIs, and does not require additional training data or the deployment of other external LVLMs. Instead, starting from the initial pool of supervised fine-tuning data, we generate a diverse set of predictions, which are ranked based on their CLIP image-text similarities, and then filtered using a robust rule-based approach to obtain a set of positive and negative pairs for DPO-based training. We applied CLIP-DPO fine-tuning to the MobileVLM-v2 family of models and to LlaVA-1.5, in all cases observing significant improvements in terms of hallucination reduction over baseline models. We also observe better performance for zero-shot classification, suggesting improved grounding capabilities, and verify that the original performance on standard LVLM benchmarks is overall preserved.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Science Question Answering on ScienceQA (Image Acc.)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/science-question-answering-on-scienceqa-image-acc.md>): Science Question Answering; ScienceQA; Image Accuracy: 67.6.

- [Object Hallucination Mitigation on AMBER](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/object-hallucination-mitigation-on-amber.md>): Object Hallucination Mitigation on Generative Tasks; AMBER; CHAIR: 3.7.

- [Hallucination Evaluation on AMBER](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hallucination-evaluation-on-amber.md>): Hallucination Evaluation; AMBER; CHAIR: 3.7.

- [Visual Question Answering on TextVQA](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-textvqa.md>): Visual Question Answering; TextVQA; Accuracy: 56.4.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10433>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10433.pdf>)
