# Safe Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning Using In-Distribution Data as Positive Examples

Source: [Safe Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning Using In-Distribution Data as Positive Examples](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa74681e209131cea6184e>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-27T06:38:02.139Z

Authors: Min Gu Kwak, Hyungu Kahng, Seoung Bum Kim

Published: 2024-08-03T22:33:13.000Z

## Abstract

Semi-supervised learning methods have shown promising results in solving many practical problems when only a few labels are available. The existing methods assume that the class distributions of labeled and unlabeled data are equal; however, their performances are significantly degraded in class distribution mismatch scenarios where out-of-distribution (OOD) data exist in the unlabeled data. Previous safe semi-supervised learning studies have addressed this problem by making OOD data less likely to affect training based on labeled data. However, even if the studies effectively filter out the unnecessary OOD data, they can lose the basic information that all data share regardless of class. To this end, we propose to apply a self-supervised contrastive learning approach to fully exploit a large amount of unlabeled data. We also propose a contrastive loss function with coefficient schedule to aggregate as an anchor the labeled negative examples of the same class into positive examples. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we conduct experiments on image classification datasets - CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Tiny ImageNet, and CIFAR-100+Tiny ImageNet - under various mismatch ratios. The results show that self-supervised contrastive learning significantly improves classification accuracy. Moreover, aggregating the in-distribution examples produces better representation and consequently further improves classification accuracy.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01872>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.01872.pdf>)
