# XS-VID: An Extremely Small Video Object Detection Dataset

Source: [XS-VID: An Extremely Small Video Object Detection Dataset](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa74401e209131cea60866>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T03:04:50.888Z

Authors: Jiahao Guo, Ziyang Xu, Lianjun Wu, Fei Gao, Wenyu Liu, Xinggang Wang

Published: 2024-07-25T15:42:46.000Z

## Abstract

Small Video Object Detection (SVOD) is a crucial subfield in modern computer vision, essential for early object discovery and detection. However, existing SVOD datasets are scarce and suffer from issues such as insufficiently small objects, limited object categories, and lack of scene diversity, leading to unitary application scenarios for corresponding methods. To address this gap, we develop the XS-VID dataset, which comprises aerial data from various periods and scenes, and annotates eight major object categories. To further evaluate existing methods for detecting extremely small objects, XS-VID extensively collects three types of objects with smaller pixel areas: extremely small (\\textit{es}, $0\\sim12^2$), relatively small (\\textit{rs}, $12^2\\sim20^2$), and generally small (\\textit{gs}, $20^2\\sim32^2$). XS-VID offers unprecedented breadth and depth in covering and quantifying minuscule objects, significantly enriching the scene and object diversity in the dataset. Extensive validations on XS-VID and the publicly available VisDrone2019VID dataset show that existing methods struggle with small object detection and significantly underperform compared to general object detectors. Leveraging the strengths of previous methods and addressing their weaknesses, we propose YOLOFT, which enhances local feature associations and integrates temporal motion features, significantly improving the accuracy and stability of SVOD. Our datasets and benchmarks are available at \\url{https://gjhhust.github.io/XS-VID/}.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18137>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.18137.pdf>)
