# Self-supervised co-salient object detection via feature correspondence at multiple scales

Source: [Self-supervised co-salient object detection via feature correspondence at multiple scales](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73e71e209131cea5eceb>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T02:58:03.881Z

Authors: Souradeep Chakraborty, Dimitris Samaras

Published: 2024-03-17T06:21:21.000Z

## Abstract

Our paper introduces a novel two-stage self-supervised approach for detecting co-occurring salient objects (CoSOD) in image groups without requiring segmentation annotations. Unlike existing unsupervised methods that rely solely on patch-level information (e.g. clustering patch descriptors) or on computation heavy off-the-shelf components for CoSOD, our lightweight model leverages feature correspondences at both patch and region levels, significantly improving prediction performance. In the first stage, we train a self-supervised network that detects co-salient regions by computing local patch-level feature correspondences across images. We obtain the segmentation predictions using confidence-based adaptive thresholding. In the next stage, we refine these intermediate segmentations by eliminating the detected regions (within each image) whose averaged feature representations are dissimilar to the foreground feature representation averaged across all the cross-attention maps (from the previous stage). Extensive experiments on three CoSOD benchmark datasets show that our self-supervised model outperforms the corresponding state-of-the-art models by a huge margin (e.g. on the CoCA dataset, our model has a 13.7% F-measure gain over the SOTA unsupervised CoSOD model). Notably, our self-supervised model also outperforms several recent fully supervised CoSOD models on the three test datasets (e.g., on the CoCA dataset, our model has a 4.6% F-measure gain over a recent supervised CoSOD model).

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Co-salient Object Detection on CoSal 2015 v1 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/co-salient-object-detection-on-cosal-2015-v1-test.md>): Co-Salient Object Detection; CoSal 2015 v1 (test); Mean Absolute Error (MAE): 6.2.

- [Co-salient Object Detection on CoSOD3k v1 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/co-salient-object-detection-on-cosod3k-v1-test.md>): Co-Salient Object Detection; CoSOD3k v1 (test); MAE: 6.4.

- [Co-salient Object Detection on CoCA v1 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/co-salient-object-detection-on-coca-v1-test.md>): Co-Salient Object Detection; CoCA v1 (test); Mean Absolute Error (MAE): 0.092.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11107>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.11107.pdf>)
