# Mitigating Privacy Risk in Membership Inference by Convex-Concave Loss

Source: [Mitigating Privacy Risk in Membership Inference by Convex-Concave Loss](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73a81e209131cea5db8f>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T02:54:13.197Z

Authors: Zhenlong Liu, Lei Feng, Huiping Zhuang, Xiaofeng Cao, Hongxin Wei

Published: 2024-02-08T07:14:17.000Z

## Abstract

Machine learning models are susceptible to membership inference attacks (MIAs), which aim to infer whether a sample is in the training set. Existing work utilizes gradient ascent to enlarge the loss variance of training data, alleviating the privacy risk. However, optimizing toward a reverse direction may cause the model parameters to oscillate near local minima, leading to instability and suboptimal performance. In this work, we propose a novel method -- Convex-Concave Loss, which enables a high variance of training loss distribution by gradient descent. Our method is motivated by the theoretical analysis that convex losses tend to decrease the loss variance during training. Thus, our key idea behind CCL is to reduce the convexity of loss functions with a concave term. Trained with CCL, neural networks produce losses with high variance for training data, reinforcing the defense against MIAs. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of CCL, achieving state-of-the-art balance in the privacy-utility trade-off.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 original (test) (LiRA and RMIA Metrics)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-original-test-lira-and-rmia-metrics.md>): Image Classification; CIFAR-10 original (test); Accuracy (Test): 79.56.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05453>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.05453.pdf>)
