# An Analysis of Human Alignment of Latent Diffusion Models

Source: [An Analysis of Human Alignment of Latent Diffusion Models](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72841e209131cea56f0d>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T02:27:53.383Z

Authors: Lorenz Linhardt, Marco Morik, Sidney Bender, Naima Elosegui Borras

Published: 2024-03-13T12:31:08.000Z

## Abstract

Diffusion models, trained on large amounts of data, showed remarkable performance for image synthesis. They have high error consistency with humans and low texture bias when used for classification. Furthermore, prior work demonstrated the decomposability of their bottleneck layer representations into semantic directions. In this work, we analyze how well such representations are aligned to human responses on a triplet odd-one-out task. We find that despite the aforementioned observations: I) The representational alignment with humans is comparable to that of models trained only on ImageNet-1k. II) The most aligned layers of the denoiser U-Net are intermediate layers and not the bottleneck. III) Text conditioning greatly improves alignment at high noise levels, hinting at the importance of abstract textual information, especially in the early stage of generation.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08469>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.08469.pdf>)
