# A Study of Dropout-Induced Modality Bias on Robustness to Missing Video Frames for Audio-Visual Speech Recognition

Source: [A Study of Dropout-Induced Modality Bias on Robustness to Missing Video Frames for Audio-Visual Speech Recognition](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72791e209131cea5698d>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-01-04T04:42:36.233Z

Authors: Yusheng Dai, Hang Chen, Jun Du, Ruoyu Wang, Shihao Chen, Jiefeng Ma, Haotian Wang, Chin-Hui Lee

Published: 2024-03-07T06:06:55.000Z

## Abstract

Advanced Audio-Visual Speech Recognition (AVSR) systems have been observed to be sensitive to missing video frames, performing even worse than single-modality models. While applying the dropout technique to the video modality enhances robustness to missing frames, it simultaneously results in a performance loss when dealing with complete data input. In this paper, we investigate this contrasting phenomenon from the perspective of modality bias and reveal that an excessive modality bias on the audio caused by dropout is the underlying reason. Moreover, we present the Modality Bias Hypothesis (MBH) to systematically describe the relationship between modality bias and robustness against missing modality in multimodal systems. Building on these findings, we propose a novel Multimodal Distribution Approximation with Knowledge Distillation (MDA-KD) framework to reduce over-reliance on the audio modality and to maintain performance and robustness simultaneously. Finally, to address an entirely missing modality, we adopt adapters to dynamically switch decision strategies. The effectiveness of our proposed approach is evaluated and validated through a series of comprehensive experiments using the MISP2021 and MISP2022 datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/dalision/ModalBiasAVSR

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Audio-Visual Speech Recognition on MISP2022 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/audio-visual-speech-recognition-on-misp2022-test.md>): Audio-Visual Speech Recognition; MISP2022 (test); cpCER: 28.06.

- [Audio-Visual Speech Recognition on MISP 2021 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/audio-visual-speech-recognition-on-misp-2021-test.md>): Audio-Visual Speech Recognition; MISP 2021 (test); CER: 0.2153.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04245>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.04245.pdf>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/dalision/ModalBiasAVSR>)
