# Seeing the Intangible: Survey of Image Classification into High-Level and Abstract Categories

Source: [Seeing the Intangible: Survey of Image Classification into High-Level and Abstract Categories](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72561e209131cea55b9f>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-21T05:00:12.672Z

Authors: Delfina Sol Martinez Pandiani, Valentina Presutti

Published: 2023-08-21T08:37:04.000Z

## Abstract

The field of Computer Vision (CV) is increasingly shifting towards \`\`high-level'' visual sensemaking tasks, yet the exact nature of these tasks remains unclear and tacit. This survey paper addresses this ambiguity by systematically reviewing research on high-level visual understanding, focusing particularly on Abstract Concepts (ACs) in automatic image classification. Our survey contributes in three main ways: Firstly, it clarifies the tacit understanding of high-level semantics in CV through a multidisciplinary analysis, and categorization into distinct clusters, including commonsense, emotional, aesthetic, and inductive interpretative semantics. Secondly, it identifies and categorizes computer vision tasks associated with high-level visual sensemaking, offering insights into the diverse research areas within this domain. Lastly, it examines how abstract concepts such as values and ideologies are handled in CV, revealing challenges and opportunities in AC-based image classification. Notably, our survey of AC image classification tasks highlights persistent challenges, such as the limited efficacy of massive datasets and the importance of integrating supplementary information and mid-level features. We emphasize the growing relevance of hybrid AI systems in addressing the multifaceted nature of AC image classification tasks. Overall, this survey enhances our understanding of high-level visual reasoning in CV and lays the groundwork for future research endeavors.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10562>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.10562.pdf>)
