# Dual-channel Prototype Network for few-shot Classification of Pathological Images

Source: [Dual-channel Prototype Network for few-shot Classification of Pathological Images](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa712f1e209131cea4fd23>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-27T06:28:17.403Z

Authors: Hao Quan, Xinjia Li, Dayu Hu, Tianhang Nan, Xiaoyu Cui

Published: 2023-11-14T03:03:21.000Z

## Abstract

In pathology, the rarity of certain diseases and the complexity in annotating pathological images significantly hinder the creation of extensive, high-quality datasets. This limitation impedes the progress of deep learning-assisted diagnostic systems in pathology. Consequently, it becomes imperative to devise a technology that can discern new disease categories from a minimal number of annotated examples. Such a technology would substantially advance deep learning models for rare diseases. Addressing this need, we introduce the Dual-channel Prototype Network (DCPN), rooted in the few-shot learning paradigm, to tackle the challenge of classifying pathological images with limited samples. DCPN augments the Pyramid Vision Transformer (PVT) framework for few-shot classification via self-supervised learning and integrates it with convolutional neural networks. This combination forms a dual-channel architecture that extracts multi-scale, highly precise pathological features. The approach enhances the versatility of prototype representations and elevates the efficacy of prototype networks in few-shot pathological image classification tasks. We evaluated DCPN using three publicly available pathological datasets, configuring small-sample classification tasks that mirror varying degrees of clinical scenario domain shifts. Our experimental findings robustly affirm DCPN's superiority in few-shot pathological image classification, particularly in tasks within the same domain, where it achieves the benchmarks of supervised learning.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07871>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.07871.pdf>)
