# SSVOD: Semi-Supervised Video Object Detection with Sparse Annotations

Source: [SSVOD: Semi-Supervised Video Object Detection with Sparse Annotations](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa712b1e209131cea4facb>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T01:59:40.801Z

Authors: Tanvir Mahmud, Chun-Hao Liu, Burhaneddin Yaman, Diana Marculescu

Published: 2023-09-04T06:41:33.000Z

## Abstract

Despite significant progress in semi-supervised learning for image object detection, several key issues are yet to be addressed for video object detection: (1) Achieving good performance for supervised video object detection greatly depends on the availability of annotated frames. (2) Despite having large inter-frame correlations in a video, collecting annotations for a large number of frames per video is expensive, time-consuming, and often redundant. (3) Existing semi-supervised techniques on static images can hardly exploit the temporal motion dynamics inherently present in videos. In this paper, we introduce SSVOD, an end-to-end semi-supervised video object detection framework that exploits motion dynamics of videos to utilize large-scale unlabeled frames with sparse annotations. To selectively assemble robust pseudo-labels across groups of frames, we introduce \\textit{flow-warped predictions} from nearby frames for temporal-consistency estimation. In particular, we introduce cross-IoU and cross-divergence based selection methods over a set of estimated predictions to include robust pseudo-labels for bounding boxes and class labels, respectively. To strike a balance between confirmation bias and uncertainty noise in pseudo-labels, we propose confidence threshold based combination of hard and soft pseudo-labels. Our method achieves significant performance improvements over existing methods on ImageNet-VID, Epic-KITCHENS, and YouTube-VIS datasets. Code and pre-trained models will be released.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01391>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.01391.pdf>)
