# Collaborative Camouflaged Object Detection: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark Source: [Collaborative Camouflaged Object Detection: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2025-10-26T01:49:52.893Z Authors: Cong Zhang, Hongbo Bi, Tian-Zhu Xiang, Ranwan Wu, Jinghui Tong, Xiufang Wang Published: 2023-10-06T13:51:46.000Z ## Abstract In this paper, we provide a comprehensive study on a new task called collaborative camouflaged object detection (CoCOD), which aims to simultaneously detect camouflaged objects with the same properties from a group of relevant images. To this end, we meticulously construct the first large-scale dataset, termed CoCOD8K, which consists of 8,528 high-quality and elaborately selected images with object mask annotations, covering 5 superclasses and 70 subclasses. The dataset spans a wide range of natural and artificial camouflage scenes with diverse object appearances and backgrounds, making it a very challenging dataset for CoCOD. Besides, we propose the first baseline model for CoCOD, named bilateral-branch network (BBNet), which explores and aggregates co-camouflaged cues within a single image and between images within a group, respectively, for accurate camouflaged object detection in given images. This is implemented by an inter-image collaborative feature exploration (CFE) module, an intra-image object feature search (OFS) module, and a local-global refinement (LGR) module. We benchmark 18 state-of-the-art models, including 12 COD algorithms and 6 CoSOD algorithms, on the proposed CoCOD8K dataset under 5 widely used evaluation metrics. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and the significantly superior performance compared to other competitors. We hope that our proposed dataset and model will boost growth in the COD community. The dataset, model, and results will be available at: https://github.com/zc199823/BBNet--CoCOD. ## Recorded benchmark results A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. ## Original sources and implementation [Original paper]() [PDF]()