# Asymmetric Co-Training with Explainable Cell Graph Ensembling for Histopathological Image Classification

Source: [Asymmetric Co-Training with Explainable Cell Graph Ensembling for Histopathological Image Classification](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa705f1e209131cea4aae9>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T01:40:08.455Z

Authors: Ziqi Yang, Zhongyu Li, Chen Liu, Xiangde Luo, Xingguang Wang, Dou Xu, Chaoqun Li, Xiaoying Qin, Meng Yang, Long Jin

Published: 2023-08-24T12:27:03.000Z

## Abstract

Convolutional neural networks excel in histopathological image classification, yet their pixel-level focus hampers explainability. Conversely, emerging graph convolutional networks spotlight cell-level features and medical implications. However, limited by their shallowness and suboptimal use of high-dimensional pixel data, GCNs underperform in multi-class histopathological image classification. To make full use of pixel-level and cell-level features dynamically, we propose an asymmetric co-training framework combining a deep graph convolutional network and a convolutional neural network for multi-class histopathological image classification. To improve the explainability of the entire framework by embedding morphological and topological distribution of cells, we build a 14-layer deep graph convolutional network to handle cell graph data. For the further utilization and dynamic interactions between pixel-level and cell-level information, we also design a co-training strategy to integrate the two asymmetric branches. Notably, we collect a private clinically acquired dataset termed LUAD7C, including seven subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma, which is rare and more challenging. We evaluated our approach on the private LUAD7C and public colorectal cancer datasets, showcasing its superior performance, explainability, and generalizability in multi-class histopathological image classification.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12737>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.12737.pdf>)
