# TACR: A Table-alignment-based Cell-selection and Reasoning Model for Hybrid Question-Answering

Source: [TACR: A Table-alignment-based Cell-selection and Reasoning Model for Hybrid Question-Answering](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f6e1e209131cea457fe>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-27T06:23:26.146Z

Authors: Jian Wu, Yicheng Xu, Yan Gao, Jian-Guang Lou, B\\"orje F. Karlsson, Manabu Okumura

Published: 2023-05-24T03:42:44.000Z

## Abstract

Hybrid Question-Answering (HQA), which targets reasoning over tables and passages linked from table cells, has witnessed significant research in recent years. A common challenge in HQA and other passage-table QA datasets is that it is generally unrealistic to iterate over all table rows, columns, and linked passages to retrieve evidence. Such a challenge made it difficult for previous studies to show their reasoning ability in retrieving answers. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel Table-alignment-based Cell-selection and Reasoning model (TACR) for hybrid text and table QA, evaluated on the HybridQA and WikiTableQuestions datasets. In evidence retrieval, we design a table-question-alignment enhanced cell-selection method to retrieve fine-grained evidence. In answer reasoning, we incorporate a QA module that treats the row containing selected cells as context. Experimental results over the HybridQA and WikiTableQuestions (WTQ) datasets show that TACR achieves state-of-the-art results on cell selection and outperforms fine-grained evidence retrieval baselines on HybridQA, while achieving competitive performance on WTQ. We also conducted a detailed analysis to demonstrate that being able to align questions to tables in the cell-selection stage can result in important gains from experiments of over 90\\% table row and column selection accuracy, meanwhile also improving output explainability.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14682>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14682.pdf>)
