# Hyperspectral Image Classification With Contrastive Graph Convolutional Network

Source: [Hyperspectral Image Classification With Contrastive Graph Convolutional Network](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f371e209131cea447de>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T01:16:36.929Z

Authors: Wentao Yu, Sheng Wan, Guangyu Li, Jian Yang, Chen Gong

Published: 2022-05-11T12:06:37.000Z

## Abstract

Recently, Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) has been widely used in Hyperspectral Image (HSI) classification due to its satisfactory performance. However, the number of labeled pixels is very limited in HSI, and thus the available supervision information is usually insufficient, which will inevitably degrade the representation ability of most existing GCN-based methods. To enhance the feature representation ability, in this paper, a GCN model with contrastive learning is proposed to explore the supervision signals contained in both spectral information and spatial relations, which is termed Contrastive Graph Convolutional Network (ConGCN), for HSI classification. First, in order to mine sufficient supervision signals from spectral information, a semi-supervised contrastive loss function is utilized to maximize the agreement between different views of the same node or the nodes from the same land cover category. Second, to extract the precious yet implicit spatial relations in HSI, a graph generative loss function is leveraged to explore supplementary supervision signals contained in the graph topology. In addition, an adaptive graph augmentation technique is designed to flexibly incorporate the spectral-spatial priors of HSI, which helps facilitate the subsequent contrastive representation learning. The extensive experimental results on four typical benchmark datasets firmly demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed ConGCN in both qualitative and quantitative aspects.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.11237>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.11237.pdf>)
