# InfraDet3D: Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection based on Roadside Infrastructure Camera and LiDAR Sensors

Source: [InfraDet3D: Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection based on Roadside Infrastructure Camera and LiDAR Sensors](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f351e209131cea44720>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T01:15:37.285Z

Authors: Walter Zimmer, Joseph Birkner, Marcel Brucker, Huu Tung Nguyen, Stefan Petrovski, Bohan Wang, Alois C. Knoll

Published: 2023-04-29T17:59:55.000Z

## Abstract

Current multi-modal object detection approaches focus on the vehicle domain and are limited in the perception range and the processing capabilities. Roadside sensor units (RSUs) introduce a new domain for perception systems and leverage altitude to observe traffic. Cameras and LiDARs mounted on gantry bridges increase the perception range and produce a full digital twin of the traffic. In this work, we introduce InfraDet3D, a multi-modal 3D object detector for roadside infrastructure sensors. We fuse two LiDARs using early fusion and further incorporate detections from monocular cameras to increase the robustness and to detect small objects. Our monocular 3D detection module uses HD maps to ground object yaw hypotheses, improving the final perception results. The perception framework is deployed on a real-world intersection that is part of the A9 Test Stretch in Munich, Germany. We perform several ablation studies and experiments and show that fusing two LiDARs with two cameras leads to an improvement of +1.90 mAP compared to a camera-only solution. We evaluate our results on the A9 infrastructure dataset and achieve 68.48 mAP on the test set. The dataset and code will be available at https://a9-dataset.com to allow the research community to further improve the perception results and make autonomous driving safer.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00314>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.00314.pdf>)
