# Global Meets Local: Effective Multi-Label Image Classification via Category-Aware Weak Supervision

Source: [Global Meets Local: Effective Multi-Label Image Classification via Category-Aware Weak Supervision](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e081e209131cea3d8e9>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T00:48:10.793Z

Authors: Jiawei Zhan, Jun Liu, Wei Tang, Guannan Jiang, Xi Wang, Bin-Bin Gao, Tianliang Zhang, Wenlong Wu, Wei Zhang, Chengjie Wang, Yuan Xie

Published: 2022-11-23T05:39:17.000Z

## Abstract

Multi-label image classification, which can be categorized into label-dependency and region-based methods, is a challenging problem due to the complex underlying object layouts. Although region-based methods are less likely to encounter issues with model generalizability than label-dependency methods, they often generate hundreds of meaningless or noisy proposals with non-discriminative information, and the contextual dependency among the localized regions is often ignored or over-simplified. This paper builds a unified framework to perform effective noisy-proposal suppression and to interact between global and local features for robust feature learning. Specifically, we propose category-aware weak supervision to concentrate on non-existent categories so as to provide deterministic information for local feature learning, restricting the local branch to focus on more high-quality regions of interest. Moreover, we develop a cross-granularity attention module to explore the complementary information between global and local features, which can build the high-order feature correlation containing not only global-to-local, but also local-to-local relations. Both advantages guarantee a boost in the performance of the whole network. Extensive experiments on two large-scale datasets (MS-COCO and VOC 2007) demonstrate that our framework achieves superior performance over state-of-the-art methods.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12716>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.12716.pdf>)
