# Prompt Tuning for Parameter-efficient Medical Image Segmentation

Source: [Prompt Tuning for Parameter-efficient Medical Image Segmentation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e001e209131cea3d4f7>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T00:48:10.793Z

Authors: Marc Fischer, Alexander Bartler, Bin Yang

Published: 2022-11-16T21:55:05.000Z

## Abstract

Neural networks pre-trained on a self-supervision scheme have become the standard when operating in data rich environments with scarce annotations. As such, fine-tuning a model to a downstream task in a parameter-efficient but effective way, e.g. for a new set of classes in the case of semantic segmentation, is of increasing importance. In this work, we propose and investigate several contributions to achieve a parameter-efficient but effective adaptation for semantic segmentation on two medical imaging datasets. Relying on the recently popularized prompt tuning approach, we provide a prompt-able UNet (PUNet) architecture, that is frozen after pre-training, but adaptable throughout the network by class-dependent learnable prompt tokens. We pre-train this architecture with a dedicated dense self-supervision scheme based on assignments to online generated prototypes (contrastive prototype assignment, CPA) of a student teacher combination alongside a concurrent segmentation loss on a subset of classes. We demonstrate that the resulting neural network model is able to attenuate the gap between fully fine-tuned and parameter-efficiently adapted models on CT imaging datasets. As such, the difference between fully fine-tuned and prompt-tuned variants amounts to only 3.83 pp for the TCIA/BTCV dataset and 2.67 pp for the CT-ORG dataset in the mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC, in %) while only prompt tokens, corresponding to 0.85% of the pre-trained backbone model with 6.8M frozen parameters, are adjusted. The code for this work is available on https://github.com/marcdcfischer/PUNet .

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09233>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.09233.pdf>)
