# Boosting Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detection with Semi-Sampling

Source: [Boosting Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detection with Semi-Sampling](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6de41e209131cea3cb24>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T00:45:11.347Z

Authors: Xiaopei Wu, Yang Zhao, Liang Peng, Hua Chen, Xiaoshui Huang, Binbin Lin, Haifeng Liu, Deng Cai, Wanli Ouyang

Published: 2022-11-14T03:22:03.000Z

## Abstract

Current 3D object detection methods heavily rely on an enormous amount of annotations. Semi-supervised learning can be used to alleviate this issue. Previous semi-supervised 3D object detection methods directly follow the practice of fully-supervised methods to augment labeled and unlabeled data, which is sub-optimal. In this paper, we design a data augmentation method for semi-supervised learning, which we call Semi-Sampling. Specifically, we use ground truth labels and pseudo labels to crop gt samples and pseudo samples on labeled frames and unlabeled frames, respectively. Then we can generate a gt sample database and a pseudo sample database. When training a teacher-student semi-supervised framework, we randomly select gt samples and pseudo samples to both labeled frames and unlabeled frames, making a strong data augmentation for them. Our semi-sampling can be regarded as an extension of gt-sampling to semi-supervised learning. Our method is simple but effective. We consistently improve state-of-the-art methods on ScanNet, SUN-RGBD, and KITTI benchmarks by large margins. For example, when training using only 10% labeled data on ScanNet, we achieve 3.1 mAP and 6.4 mAP improvement upon 3DIoUMatch in terms of mAP@0.25 and mAP@0.5. When training using only 1% labeled data on KITTI, we boost 3DIoUMatch by 3.5 mAP, 6.7 mAP and 14.1 mAP on car, pedestrian and cyclist classes. Codes will be made publicly available at https://github.com/LittlePey/Semi-Sampling.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07084>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.07084.pdf>)
