# A Model to Measure the Spread Power of Rumors

Source: [A Model to Measure the Spread Power of Rumors](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6cd91e209131cea36392>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-01-04T03:14:20.154Z

Authors: Zoleikha Jahanbakhsh-Nagadeh, Mohammad-Reza Feizi-Derakhshi, Majid Ramezani, Taymaz Akan, Meysam Asgari-Chenaghlu, Narjes Nikzad-Khasmakhi, Ali-Reza Feizi-Derakhshi, Mehrdad Ranjbar-Khadivi, Elnaz Zafarani-Moattar, Mohammad-Ali Balafar

Published: 2020-02-18T13:57:10.000Z

## Abstract

With technologies that have democratized the production and reproduction of information, a significant portion of daily interacted posts in social media has been infected by rumors. Despite the extensive research on rumor detection and verification, so far, the problem of calculating the spread power of rumors has not been considered. To address this research gap, the present study seeks a model to calculate the Spread Power of Rumor (SPR) as the function of content-based features in two categories: False Rumor (FR) and True Rumor (TR). For this purpose, the theory of Allport and Postman will be adopted, which it claims that importance and ambiguity are the key variables in rumor-mongering and the power of rumor. Totally 42 content features in two categories "importance" (28 features) and "ambiguity" (14 features) are introduced to compute SPR. The proposed model is evaluated on two datasets, Twitter and Telegram. The results showed that (i) the spread power of False Rumor documents is rarely more than True Rumors. (ii) there is a significant difference between the SPR means of two groups False Rumor and True Rumor. (iii) SPR as a criterion can have a positive impact on distinguishing False Rumors and True Rumors.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Rumor Detection on Telegram Persian Rumor Dataset (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/rumor-detection-on-telegram-persian-rumor-dataset-test.md>): Rumor Detection; Telegram Persian Rumor Dataset (test); Precision (TR): 85.5.

- [Rumor Detection on Twitter (Persian Rumor Dataset) (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/rumor-detection-on-twitter-persian-rumor-dataset-test.md>): Rumor Detection; Twitter (Persian Rumor Dataset) (test); Precision (TR): 73.6.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07563>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.07563.pdf>)
